Project – Preference for mode of delivery among women of reproductive age group
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
- Background to the Study
The preference for mode of delivery—vaginal delivery versus caesarean section—among women of reproductive age is influenced by a combination of medical, socio-cultural, psychological, and economic factors. Globally, there has been a notable increase in caesarean section (CS) rates, often exceeding the World Health Organization’s recommended threshold of 10–15% (WHO, 2015). In both high-income and low-income countries, this rise is partly attributed to women’s changing perceptions and preferences, often shaped by concerns about labor pain, perceived safety of CS, and previous birth experiences (Boerma et al., 2018).
Research indicates that many women prefer vaginal delivery due to the faster recovery time, lower healthcare costs, and the perception of it being more “natural” (Gamble & Creedy, 2001). However, the preference can shift if a woman has had a traumatic previous delivery, experiences anxiety about labor pain, or receives strong medical advice in favor of CS. Additionally, the level of education and access to antenatal information are critical in shaping these preferences. In several studies, higher educational attainment among women was associated with increased preference for caesarean delivery, possibly due to better access to information and autonomy in decision-making (Mazzoni et al., 2011).
Cultural beliefs also play a significant role in shaping preferences. In some African and Asian societies, vaginal birth is often viewed as a sign of womanhood and strength, while caesarean birth may be seen as a sign of weakness or failure (Kyomuhendo, 2003). Conversely, in urban and more affluent settings, elective CS is sometimes viewed as modern and convenient. Thus, the intersection of tradition, modernity, and socio-economic status greatly affects delivery choices, suggesting that preference is context-dependent.
Health system factors, including the availability of healthcare providers, hospital policies, and provider biases, further influence women’s preferences. Studies have shown that some women choose CS because they perceive it as safer or more controlled, especially when healthcare workers express a preference for it (Hassan et al., 2020). In some settings, private healthcare providers may be more inclined to recommend CS due to financial incentives, potentially skewing women’s preferences through medical advice (Yisma et al., 2019).
Importantly, women’s autonomy and participation in the decision-making process is a determinant of satisfaction with the mode of delivery. Research emphasizes the need for shared decision-making, where healthcare providers offer balanced information and respect patient choices (Nystedt & Hildingsson, 2014). Antenatal education and counseling are effective in empowering women with knowledge that supports informed decisions about delivery methods. Where such support is lacking, women may feel pressured or ill-prepared to choose a delivery method that aligns with their personal values and health needs.
The preference for mode of delivery among women of reproductive age is multifactorial. It reflects an interplay between individual beliefs, prior experiences, cultural norms, healthcare provider influence, and systemic healthcare structures. For policies to support informed choices and optimal maternal outcomes, they must address these diverse and interrelated influences through comprehensive antenatal education, respectful maternity care, and equity in access to delivery options.
1.2. Statement of the Problem
Despite advances in maternal health and increased access to skilled birth attendants, the choice between vaginal delivery and caesarean section continues to be a complex and controversial issue among women of reproductive age. While vaginal birth is generally considered the natural and often safer method for uncomplicated pregnancies, the rate of caesarean section has increased significantly across both developed and developing countries. This rising trend raises concerns about whether women’s preferences are being influenced by informed choice, medical necessity, or non-medical factors such as fear of labor, misinformation, and healthcare provider biases.
In many healthcare settings, especially in low- and middle-income countries, women often lack access to comprehensive antenatal counseling that addresses delivery options. As a result, their preferences may be shaped by cultural beliefs, previous experiences, hearsay, or pressure from family and healthcare providers rather than evidence-based knowledge. Inadequate antenatal education limits their autonomy and capacity to make informed decisions about their preferred mode of delivery. This can lead to dissatisfaction with birth outcomes and an increased likelihood of maternal and neonatal complications due to mismatched expectations.
Furthermore, the influence of healthcare professionals cannot be underestimated. In some hospitals, particularly private ones, caesarean sections may be promoted for reasons of convenience or financial gain rather than medical necessity. In such scenarios, women may feel coerced or led into choosing a delivery mode that does not align with their personal values or health needs. This dynamic reflects a significant gap in patient-centered care and raises ethical concerns about respect for women’s autonomy in childbirth.
Another issue is the growing normalization of elective caesarean section, even in the absence of medical indications. In some urban and better-educated populations, CS is increasingly viewed as a modern, pain-free, and time-saving option. While this perception may empower some women, it may also result in an over-reliance on surgical births without fully understanding the associated risks, such as increased maternal morbidity, longer recovery time, and complications in future pregnancies. This trend has implications for public health systems and resource allocation.
The lack of consistent data on women’s preferences for mode of delivery in many regions further complicates the situation. In several countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia, research on women’s perspectives regarding childbirth is either limited or non-existent. Without accurate, context-specific data, it is difficult for policymakers and health planners to develop targeted interventions that promote safe and respectful maternity care. Understanding women’s preferences and the factors influencing them is crucial to designing services that meet their needs and ensure positive childbirth experiences.
In conclusion, the rising rates of caesarean section and the mixed motivations behind women’s delivery preferences highlight an urgent need for better maternal health education, improved communication between women and healthcare providers, and stronger policy frameworks that protect women’s rights to informed choice. Addressing these challenges is essential not only for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes but also for advancing respectful and dignified care in childbirth services.
1.3. Aim and Objectives of the Study
The aim of the study is to examine the Preference for mode of delivery among women of reproductive age group in Jos, Plateau State Nigeria. The specific objectives are:
- To determine the factors influencing women’s preference for mode of delivery in Jos, Plateau State.
- To assess the knowledge and awareness of different delivery options among women of reproductive age in the study area.
- To explore the attitudes and perceptions of women towards various modes of delivery.
- To identify any barriers that women face in accessing their preferred mode of delivery.
1.4. Research Questions
The research questions are buttressed below:
- What factors influence women’s preference for mode of delivery in Jos, Plateau State?
- How knowledgeable and aware are women of reproductive age in the study area about different delivery options?
- What are the attitudes and perceptions of women towards various modes of delivery?
- What barriers do women face in accessing their preferred mode of delivery?
1.5. Research Hypothesis
The hypothetical statement of the study is buttressed below:
Ho: Attitudes and perceptions of women will not affect their modes of delivery.
H1: Attitudes and perceptions of women will affect their modes of delivery.
1.6. Significance of the Study
Understanding the preference for mode of delivery among women of reproductive age is crucial in promoting informed decision-making and ensuring that maternal health services are tailored to meet women’s needs and expectations. This study offers valuable insights into the factors that influence delivery choices, helping healthcare professionals and policymakers create patient-centered interventions that enhance maternal satisfaction and safety. By identifying the knowledge gaps, cultural influences, and systemic barriers that affect women’s preferences, the findings can guide efforts to support autonomy in childbirth decisions.
The study is significant to healthcare providers, particularly obstetricians, midwives, and nurses, as it sheds light on how communication, counseling, and patient education impact women’s choices. When healthcare workers understand the reasons behind women’s preferences, they can better address misconceptions, provide balanced information, and support shared decision-making. This contributes to improved patient-provider relationships, reduces the likelihood of conflict during labor and delivery, and fosters a more respectful and empowering birth experience for women.
For public health policymakers and program planners, the study provides evidence that can inform the design of maternal health policies and antenatal care programs. As caesarean section rates continue to rise globally, distinguishing between medically necessary and elective procedures becomes critical. Policymakers can use the study’s findings to develop guidelines that encourage appropriate use of caesarean sections, improve antenatal education services, and allocate resources efficiently to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
This research also has relevance for women’s rights and reproductive justice advocates. Understanding women’s preferences and the socio-cultural dynamics influencing them is essential in promoting autonomy and informed consent in maternity care. The study highlights the need for respectful maternity services that honor women’s choices, thus supporting broader efforts to combat coercion, discrimination, and unnecessary medical interventions during childbirth.
Additionally, the study contributes to the academic body of knowledge by filling gaps in local or regional data on maternal preferences for delivery mode. In many low- and middle-income countries, such research is limited, making it difficult to develop context-specific maternal health strategies. This study, therefore, serves as a foundation for future research and a reference for comparative studies across different populations and healthcare systems.
In summary, this study is significant for multiple stakeholders—including women, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and researchers—by providing a deeper understanding of the multifaceted factors that influence delivery choices. It advocates for more responsive and respectful maternity care systems and reinforces the importance of giving women the knowledge and agency to make informed decisions about their childbirth experience.
1.7. Scope of the Study
The study examines Preference for mode of delivery among women of reproductive age group in Jos, Plateau State Nigeria. A study of selected Maternity Hospitals in Jos, Plateau State Nigeria
1.8. Operational Definition of Terms
Preference: Preference refers to an individual’s inclination or choice toward one option over others based on personal desires, beliefs, experiences, or perceived benefits. In the context of healthcare, it reflects what a person favors or opts for when presented with different alternatives.
Mode of Delivery: Mode of delivery refers to the method by which a baby is born. The two main types are vaginal delivery (natural birth through the birth canal) and caesarean section (surgical delivery through an incision in the mother’s abdomen and uterus).
Women: Women are adult human females, typically identified biologically by characteristics such as the presence of reproductive organs like ovaries and uterus, and socially by gender identity. In medical contexts, women are often the focus in reproductive health studies.
Reproductive Age Group: The reproductive age group typically refers to females aged approximately 15 to 49 years, during which they are biologically capable of conceiving and bearing children. This age range is widely used in public health and demographic studies related to fertility and maternal health.